2006 Jaguar XJ vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJ (400 HP) has 257 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2005 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jaguar XJ | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Jaguar | Ford |
| Model | XJ | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2490 mm |
