2006 Jaguar XJ8 vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJ8 weights approximately 364 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Jaguar XJ8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Jaguar XJ8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jaguar XJ8 | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | XJ8 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2680 mm |
