2006 Jaguar XJ8 vs. 2000 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 (300 HP) has 226 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJ8 weights approximately 563 kg more than 2000 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jaguar XJ8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Jaguar XJ8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 323. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Jaguar XJ8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jaguar XJ8 | 2000 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XJ8 | 323 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1324 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 109 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1147 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 55 L |
