2006 Jaguar XJR vs. 1987 Lada Samara
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJR is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJR (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 336 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 834 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XJR (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 464 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Lada Samara. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Lada Samara. 2006 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1987 Lada Samara has manual transmission. 1987 Lada Samara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jaguar XJR | 1987 Lada Samara | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lada |
| Model | XJR | Samara |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1288 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.9 seconds | 14.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 43 L |
