2006 Jaguar XJR vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJR is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJR (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (93 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 739 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XJR (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio. 2006 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1991 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1991 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jaguar XJR | 1991 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | XJR | Clio |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 43 L |
