2006 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJR (400 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (281 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XJR (560 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 2006 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE. 2006 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | XJR | UTE |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |