2006 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XK is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B3000. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XK weights approximately 210 kg more than 2004 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2006 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jaguar XK | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | B3000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 244 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |