2006 Jaguar XK vs. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar XK weights approximately 501 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XK (411 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo. (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo. 2006 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo has manual transmission. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jaguar XK | 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
| Model | XK | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.6 seconds | 12.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1848 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |
