2006 Jaguar XK8 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XK8 (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 186 kg more than 2006 Jaguar XK8.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XK8 (411 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (382 Nm). This means 2006 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jaguar XK8 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XK8 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 87 L |