2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1950 Maserati 8CLT
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 8CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 8CLT would be higher. At 2,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Maserati 8CLT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 8CLT (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 8CLT should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1231 kg more than 1950 Maserati 8CLT.
Because 2006 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Maserati 8CLT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1950 Maserati 8CLT has manual transmission. 1950 Maserati 8CLT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Cherokee | 1950 Maserati 8CLT | |
Make | Jeep | Maserati |
Model | Cherokee | 8CLT |
Year Released | 2006 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 2980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 424 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |