2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,699 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1176 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Cherokee | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Jeep | Zastava |
| Model | Cherokee | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 3699 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2010 mm |
