2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1973 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1545 kg more than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Cherokee | 1973 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Cherokee | Fronte |
Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 42 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 486 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 30 L |