2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 337 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2006 Jeep Cherokee has manual transmission. 2006 Jeep Cherokee will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Cherokee | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cherokee | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1817 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2760 mm |
