2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1983 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1983 Opel Ascona. (74 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1111 kg more than 1983 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (401 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Opel Ascona. (101 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Cherokee | 1983 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | Cherokee | Ascona |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 73.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 70 L |