2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1983 Renault 9
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,699 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1983 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1211 kg more than 1983 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Cherokee | 1983 Renault 9 | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Cherokee | 9 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3699 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 38 L |