2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (144 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 347 kg more than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Cherokee | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cherokee | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1817 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
