2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 201 kg more than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Cherokee | 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cherokee | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2774 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1677 kg | 1476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2730 mm |
