2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,774 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 637 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Cherokee | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Cherokee | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2774 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 121 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1677 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |