2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 4 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Cherokee | 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cherokee | Challenger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1834 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2730 mm |