2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saab 9000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saab 9000 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9000 (165 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (144 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000 should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 152 kg more than 2005 Saab 9000.
Because 2006 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Saab 9000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9000 (280 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (215 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Cherokee | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
| Make | Jeep | Saab |
| Model | Cherokee | 9000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2290 cc |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1817 kg | 1665 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 61 L |
