2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS

To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Cherokee.

Because 2006 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (531 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Jeep Cherokee 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS
Make Jeep Mercedes-Benz
Model Cherokee CLS
Year Released 2006 2008
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2774 cc 5461 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 160 HP 382 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 531 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 2800 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.4 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 78 L 80 L