2006 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (144 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Cherokee.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Jeep Cherokee 2012 Mazda BT-50
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Cherokee BT-50
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2429 cc 2953 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 144 HP 154 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3200 RPM
Torque 215 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 180 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 96.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 101 mm 102 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Height 1870 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 3010 mm