2006 Jeep Commander vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (210 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 183 kg more than 2006 Jeep Commander.
Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Commander | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Jeep | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Commander | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1950 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3704 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 6.4:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1677 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2270 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3690 mm |
