2006 Jeep Commander vs. 1964 Maserati Mistral

To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 4,703 cc, 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Maserati Mistral (243 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Commander. (235 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 427 kg more than 1964 Maserati Mistral.

Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Maserati Mistral. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1964 Maserati Mistral has manual transmission. 1964 Maserati Mistral will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Jeep Commander 1964 Maserati Mistral
Make Jeep Maserati
Model Commander Mistral
Year Released 2006 1964
Body Type SUV Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4703 cc 3694 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 235 HP 243 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5500 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1677 kg 1250 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2410 mm