2006 Jeep Commander vs. 1968 Triumph GT6
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph GT6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph GT6 would be higher. At 4,703 cc, 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (235 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1968 Triumph GT6. (105 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph GT6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 817 kg more than 1968 Triumph GT6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (414 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph GT6. (159 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph GT6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Commander | 1968 Triumph GT6 | |
| Make | Jeep | Triumph |
| Model | Commander | GT6 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 414 Nm | 159 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1677 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 63 L |
