2006 Jeep Commander vs. 1972 Renault 5
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 5 would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1625 kg more than 1972 Renault 5.
Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Renault 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1972 Renault 5 has manual transmission. 1972 Renault 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Commander | 1972 Renault 5 | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Commander | 5 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5653 cc | 1287 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2410 mm |
