2006 Jeep Commander vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 467 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (319 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Commander | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Commander | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1677 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2270 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |