2006 Jeep Commander vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Seat Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Seat Cordoba would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1999 Seat Cordoba. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1999 Seat Cordoba.
Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Seat Cordoba. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Cordoba (321 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Commander. (319 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Commander. 2006 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1999 Seat Cordoba has manual transmission. 1999 Seat Cordoba will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Commander | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
Make | Jeep | Seat |
Model | Commander | Cordoba |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 321 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2520 mm |