2006 Jeep Commander vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (319 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Commander | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Jeep | Proton |
| Model | Commander | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2270 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2610 mm |
