2006 Jeep Commander vs. 2005 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Titan. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Titan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 147 kg more than 2005 Nissan Titan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Commander. (500 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Commander | 2005 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Commander | Titan |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 514 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.5 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 2208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 106 L |