2006 Jeep Commander vs. 2005 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Highlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Highlander would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Highlander (230 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Commander. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 47 kg more than 2005 Toyota Highlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Highlander (328 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Commander. (319 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Commander | 2005 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Commander | Highlander |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 328 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1677 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2270 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 73 L |