2006 Jeep Commander vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, both 2006 Jeep Commander and 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Commander. (235 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 133 kg more than 2006 Jeep Commander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (460 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Commander. (414 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Commander | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Commander | CLS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 4965 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 414 Nm | 460 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1677 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 89 L |