2006 Jeep Commander vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (210 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Commander | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Commander | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2270 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2490 mm |