2006 Jeep Commander vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 4,703 cc, 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (235 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 127 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (414 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2006 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Jeep Commander 2009 Mazda 3
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Commander 3
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4703 cc 1999 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 235 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 414 Nm 183 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 101 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 10.0:1
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1677 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 12.4 L/100km 7.5 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 15.7 L/100km 10 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.8 L/100km 8.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 78 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]