2006 Jeep Commander vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 4,703 cc, 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (235 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C30. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C30.
Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (414 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C30. (240 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Commander | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | Commander | C30 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1560 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 414 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 70 L |