2006 Jeep Commander vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 4,703 cc, 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (235 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Colorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (414 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Commander | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | Commander | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 3600 cc |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 414 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
