2006 Jeep Commander vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 4,703 cc, 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (235 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (414 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. 2006 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2012 Citroen C-Crosser has manual transmission. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Commander | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Jeep | Citroen |
Model | Commander | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 2179 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 414 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |