2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (410 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2210 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 64 L |