2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1978 Mazda 929
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1099 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1978 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 929 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2169 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 55 L |