2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1989 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2210 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1910 mm |
