2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1991 Rover Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Rover Land Rover Discovery. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Rover Land Rover Discovery would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Rover Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 341 kg more than 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1991 Rover Land Rover Discovery | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Land Rover Discovery |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1991 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 3947 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 94.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1677 kg | 2018 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1970 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 88 L |
