2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1994 Rover 100
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 100 would be higher. At 6,063 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (420 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 317 more horse power than 1994 Rover 100. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1350 kg more than 1994 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1994 Rover 100 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 100 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6063 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 569 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 103 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1380 mm |