2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (144 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 951 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 50 L |