2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 996 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (152 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Baleno |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2390 mm |