2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (228 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (222 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (410 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Jeep | Land Rover |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 410 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2550 mm |