2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2003 Lexus LX

To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lexus LX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lexus LX would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (235 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2003 Lexus LX. (232 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2003 Lexus LX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lexus LX weights approximately 753 kg more than 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lexus LX (434 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (415 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Lexus LX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 Lexus LX
Make Jeep Lexus
Model Grand Cherokee LX
Year Released 2006 2003
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4703 cc 4662 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 235 HP 232 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 415 Nm 434 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3400 RPM
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1677 kg 2430 kg
Vehicle Length 4750 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1860 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 78 L 66 L