2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2003 Maserati Kubang
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Maserati Kubang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Maserati Kubang would be higher. At 4,244 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Maserati Kubang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Maserati Kubang (385 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Maserati Kubang should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Maserati Kubang. (461 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Maserati Kubang.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2003 Maserati Kubang | |
Make | Jeep | Maserati |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Kubang |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 4244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 461 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |