2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saab 9000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saab 9000 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (165 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 545 kg more than 2005 Saab 9000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Saab 9000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (410 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Jeep | Saab |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 9000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2210 kg | 1665 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 61 L |