2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (253 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (288 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Jeep | Chevrolet |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Captiva |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 253 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 288 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2150 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 65 L |