2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2013 Ferrari FF HELE
To start off, 2013 Ferrari FF HELE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 330 kg more than 2013 Ferrari FF HELE.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2013 Ferrari FF HELE has manual transmission. 2013 Ferrari FF HELE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2013 Ferrari FF HELE | |
| Make | Jeep | Ferrari |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | FF HELE |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 75 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2210 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4907 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1953 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1379 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2990 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.9 L/100km | 15.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 91 L |
